The Lookout news Logo Logo horizontal ruler
Search Archive Columns Special Reports The City Commerce Links About Us Contact

City Preps Residents to Defend Beach Parking Zones

By Jorge Casuso

February 9, 2000 -- On the surface, it seemed just another meeting of city staff and their constituents. But with seven Ocean Park preferential parking zones on the line - all of them more than 10 years old -, Saturday's meeting at the Ken Edwards Center was anything but routine.

Instead of just providing information and listening to concerns, planning department staff helped coach and organize some three dozen residents for a crucial Coastal Commission meeting Tuesday morning.

After a year's delay, the commission finally will decide the fate of 936 preferential parking spaces south of Pico Boulevard and east of Lincoln Boulevard that were created by the city without commission approval between 1983 and 1989. The commission discovered the spaces in 1998, while considering the Edgemar Development project on Main Street.

"Don't be exclusionary," Planning Director Suzanne Frick advised the residents. "What is important is to put a face on this issue. We don't want to alienate this commission."

Among the key points city staff encouraged residents to make are the dearth of street parking, the availability of parking in beach lots and the make up of the community (it is not just rich homeowners).

Residents who spoke at Saturday's meeting said they feared that if preferential parking is revoked they wouldn't be able to move their cars or entertain guests, especially on weekends, because there will often be nowhere to park near their homes.

"I can't leave during the day, but there are empty spaces on the beach," said one resident who lives in a zone near Main Street with no daytime restrictions. "As usual, the residents are going to be caught in the middle of this squabble."

While there are 2,400 spaces in Ocean Park's two beach lots, it costs $7 to park ($6 during the winter.) By comparison, unrestricted street parking is free.

Frick, however, warned against bringing up the underused lot, saying that lowering the rates - which already are cheaper than the rates at Venice Beach and Will Rogers State Park - is not on the table.

She did encourage residents who blamed the parking woes not on beach goers, but on employees and customers of Main Street businesses, to speak out on Tuesday.

"It's a major impact," said Roger Genser, a 22-year resident of Ocean Park who helped organize the first Ocean Park zone in 1983. "It was a reaction against Main Street. It had nothing to do with beach parking."

Tuesday's decision will center on whether Santa Monica's zones restrict access to the beach, which the Coastal Commission was created in 1976 to protect.

Commission staff has recommended that the seven zones be retained - with the caveat that the city must reapply for the permits in three years. The city opposes that condition, saying it would be too costly, inhibit long-range planning and leave residents in limbo. Instead city staff is proposing to conduct a parking monitoring program and file a report within five years.

Commission staff also is requiring the city to create 154 spaces to help replenish those taken up by preferential parking. Of these, 65 already have been created. The city also must keep the Tide and Pier beach shuttles running during the summer months.

While Coastal Commission staff seems sympathetic to the plight of beach area residents, it is impossible to predict what the commission will do, Frick said. One warning sign was a complaint by a commissioner who visited the beach to watch the sunset and found no place to park.

"We've been discussing this with the staff for a year and a half," Frick said. "I think this really boils down to philosophical issues with the commission."

Although the city has been negotiating with commission staff, it also has made it clear that it is prepared to file a lawsuit if the commission revokes the zones.

"We have a difference of legal opinion as to whether the Coastal Commission even has authority," Frick said. "We would prefer to go through the process and have a positive outcome."

Since the Coastal Act was passed in 1976, the Coastal Commission has required cities to apply for permits for the special parking zones.

Historically, the Coastal Commission has granted permission for preferential parking zones in coastal communities, often imposing strict conditions to ensure plenty of public parking and beach access.

Since 1982 the commission has approved three applications from Hermosa Beach, Santa Cruz and Capitola. The commission, however, has denied preferential parking permits for Santa Monica's closest neighbors - Venice to the south and Pacific Palisades to the north.

In 1998 approximately 7.5 million visitors flocked to Santa Monica beaches. Over the past 28 years beach attendance has grown by 20 percent.

City Manager Susan McCarthy, who did not attend the meeting, said it would be "unforgivable" if residents weren't prepared given what's at stake.

"The Coastal Commission has a relatively clear mission laid out in the law, and in this situation, it may not be a mission that is sympathetic," McCarthy said. "This would certainly be a profound change."

The Coastal Commission will meet Tuesday at 10 a.m. at the Four Points Sheraton, 530 Pico Blvd.

Staff writer Teresa Rochester contributed to this report.

Lookout Logo footer image Copyright 1999-2008 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved.      EMAIL

 

  Take the Politics Out of the School District, New Parents Group Pleads

By Jorge Casuso

Speaking in frank terms that sometimes recalled a 12-step program, a group of parent activists Monday night launched a crusade to take the politics out of the school district.

The more than two dozen parents who met at the Ken Edwards Center called for political parties and organizations to stay out of the November race for three open board seats. Charging that parents are often inhibited from speaking out, the group also called for a freer flow of information from the district, which is facing a multi-million budget shortfall.

"What we're talking about," said John Petz, who ran and helped organize the meeting, "is changing the current paradigm, a sea change, changing the culture of our district. Start by not being quiet at meetings. That would be an immediate sea change."

One after another, parents denounced an atmosphere that they said discourages any open criticism of the school district. Criticize, they said, and you're branded anti-children.

"It was being disloyal letting the voters know there was dirty laundry," said Abby Arnold about her tenure on a school bond committee. "It reminds one a lot of a family where dad comes home drunk and falls in the garage, and no one talks about it."

"I have a fear my child will be retaliated against," another parent said. "Board members have taken things very personally."

Stressing they are not forming a new party, the group - which is even avoiding giving itself a name - outlined a series of goals. They included forging a partnership between parents and school officials; creating a freer flow of information that will lead to greater accountability and putting an end to what they called the district's "voodoo economics."

The group also listed qualities it would like to see in board candidates. They include:

· Demonstrating intelligence ("They could be sitting on it," Petz said, referring to current board members), civility, courage, leadership and commitment (Board members, parents complained, are seldom seen on school grounds);
· Bringing a "fresh perspective" and offering an expertise in budgeting;
· Being openly accountable to constituents and having the ability to give direction to staff. (Parents complained that the board often acted based on staff recommendations its members accepted on faith without full understanding of the issues).

The group hopes to make the November elections non-partisan by taking advantage of a range of mediums candidates can use to appeal directly to the voters, bypassing traditional political organizations. They include the internet, cable television, micro radio and forums such as those staged by the League of Women Voters.

But staging a non-partisan election will require the cooperation of Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights, the city's powerful grassroots tenants group that has been behind the election of most of the board's members for years.

"It's time to change the dynamic," said a parent who asked to remain anonymous. "I think it's very important to get SMRR absolutely in tune with reforming this district."

Former school board president Patricia Hoffman, a member of SMRR's Steering Comittee, who was applauded by parents for her active involvement with the schools during her tenure, defended the organization.

"I think SMRR has done a lot of really fabulous things," Hoffman said. "This meeting has been really productive identifying the problems."

Lookout Logo footer image Copyright 1999-2008 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved.      EMAIL